Thursday, April 12, 2007

As clear as a mixture of water with silt- or clay-sized earth material, ranging from semi-fluid to soft and plastic

Sometimes I look at a piece of writing I’ve been asked to proofread, and I feel afraid and overwhelmed. I try reading the first sentence, but I can’t grasp the meaning. I start to feel faint….

Working as a comms person within large organisations, you learn to juggle, and compromise. You have to satisfy both internal and external clients; helping colleagues develop PR materials, while also acting as a ‘gatekeeper’.

Ensuring all external communications issued by an organisation reflect a consistent and professional image is essential. But be prepared for a few sparks to fly if you’re the one making the call. Especially when some individuals are precious about their subject matter or their writing ability.

I’ve had complaints that once I’d finished re-wording a document it had lost all its personality. I’ve argued with people who insisted their original wording was ‘friendlier’, despite poor grammar and a host of mixed metaphors.

I understand the need, especially with promotional materials, to project a ‘voice’ that appeals to the audience – you don’t want to bore them senseless. But there is a difference between informality and plain sloppiness.

I’ve proofed documents where authors use slang, or suddenly switch from third to first person to inject a personal joke or anecdote. This is something I just cannot abide.

At the other end of the spectrum, some people become attached to jargon and insist every technical phrase is absolutely necessary. If the audience are like-minded experts in the field, I usually relent. But if the audience are common folk like me, I plead the case for plain English.

Clear and concise writing does not need to be boring, or over-simplified. You can still be expressive and convey complicated ideas. I look at proofing as simply removing barriers to understanding the message.

Good writing shouldn’t be weighed down with big words and lengthy sentences. It shouldn’t daunt or confuse readers.

My new catchphrase: Don’t intimidate – communicate!

P.S. Check out the Gobbledygook of the Week at the Plain English Campaign for some truly shocking examples of poor writing, with some seemingly deliberately designed to bamboozle.

Sunday, April 1, 2007

Sniff! Time to get excited

My dog Monty has quite a nose. He loves nothing more than getting low to the ground and having a good sniff. Mind you, he's already rather low, being a Dacshund and all. Very low and very long. It makes me smile to see his enthusiasm for sniffing. His tail starts wagging like crazy and he becomes totally obsessed by a particular scent. He won't respond to my calls.
The decision to start this blog comes from a desire to develop my own sense of passion and enthusiasm. To create something that I care about. I find it daunting - it's unlike me to declare to the world that I'm worth listening to (that's how it feels, regardless of actual readership levels).
I've been inspired by a number of sites I've discovered recently including PRdisasters, Young PR and Forward. I tend to get bored too easily when I'm online. I don't like sitting at the computer, I don't like reading from the screen. But suddenly - after reading a little more about this thing called blogging - I feel like I've been missing out. I've been working in communications/PR type roles since I left uni, but not since I've started really investigating online have I felt so connected to the profession. I want to read the opinions of experienced professionals, I want to keep abreast of change, I want know more about this thing called social media - and I want to contribute.
Hopefully, I can manage to keep up the enthusiasm I have right now, and start sniffing out a few interesting tidbits and ideas to share with you.